![]() ![]() news cycle, but became great agit-prop tools in Russia, whose state-affiliated news agencies picked up on each morsel as yet another example of the cornucopia of electoral corruption in the decadent West. Gidwani characterized the information leaked had very little impact on the U.S. presidential election.Īt the outset, the Guccifer 2.0 releases were following that pattern. Gidwani believes that the Russian hack may have initially been intended for low-level intel that could be used to support Russian narratives about the U.S., but morphed into an attempt to influence the U.S. “Guccifer 2.0 has been part of a Russian denial and deception program,” said Toni Gidwani, director of research operations at ThreatConnect on a conference call today. The idea that a non-governmental actor pursuing a personal political agenda could hack the DNC and potentially sway an election is bad enough, an act of cyberwarfare by a foreign state is arguably much worse. But ThreatConnect’s research suggests that Guccifer 2.0 is simply an invention of the Russian government to deflect attention from its involvement in the breach. ![]() Now that DNC emails harvested during the breaches are starting to appear on Wikileaks, pundits are speculating that Russia leaked the emails in a bid to land Donald Trump in the Oval Office. But is the email leak also attributable to hackers on Russia’s government payroll?Ī new analysis released by security consulting firm ThreatConnect has marshaled more evidence to prove that hackers linked to the Russian government communicated with journalists about the leaked documents.Ī hacker set up a website and Twitter account to take credit for the DNC breach soon after it was initially reported, calling himself Guccifer 2.0 (a moniker modeled after a Romanian hacker who is recently pleaded guilty to hacking American political operatives). That claim shed doubt on initial reports from The Washington Post and others that laid the responsibility for the breach squarely at the feet of organizations with ties to the Russian government and its president, Vladimir Putin. ![]() Contact information is included on the Faculty Notification letter.By now, it’s pretty clear that Russian hackers are responsible for breaches of the Democratic National Committee networks that occurred last summer and in April of this year - several forensic security firms have found evidence that traces the breach back to Russia. If there are questions or concerns regarding the notetaker or this accommodation, either contact the student’s Disability Coordinator or direct the student to the Disability Coordinator. Notes are provided for student personal use only. Please contact the need for notes restriction arise. If the student is absent from class, the professor has the right to restrict notes access for missed days of class, unless the student is eligible to receive additional absences. Payment will be made at the end of the semester.”īoth the notetaker and the DRC registered student should attend class regularly. For providing this service, you will be paid $100 per course section. If you plan to attend class regularly and are interested in being a notetaker, please go to and click on “Notetaker Registration”. “A student in this course requires a notetaker. If you do not know of any students in your course with good notetaking skills, please make the following announcement not mentioning the name(s) of the student: If possible, identify a student in the course who you believe would be a competent and dependable notetaker. Depending upon the student’s disability-related limitations, notetakers serve to either supplement the student’s notes or provide notes fully for the student.įaculty will be contacted by the Disability Resource Center (DRC) if assistance with recruiting a notetaker is needed. Students with disabilities may be accommodated with notetakers in their classes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |